Genophilosophy Essay -- Philosophy Philosophical Essays

GenophilosophyABSTRACT contemporary progress in life knowledges, particularly in ancestral engineering, is ever-changing our fantasy of human being and a whole series of otherwise philosophical and common notions. The conventional idea of relegate will no longer be the final reference for philosophical thinking, since even the subject qua biological or psychological structure will enjoy a high degree of unpredictability. The results of gene technology require reinterpreting much(prenominal) concepts as reproduction, individuality, history, independence and subjectivity. This paper focuses on the head teacher of freedom, where freedom means the contentedness to deliberate and choose between different alternatives of action. We hold that the issue of freedom is relevant for genetics. Considering that genes can decide between alternatives, it is possible to speak most the freedom of genes, at least in a metaphoric sense. It has been suggested that genes atomic number 18 more free than human beings because they encoded us. The human genome program thus helps us to understand what kind of structures human beings are dependent upon. The main question that we address in this paper concerns the entire human genome project and exclusively its implications including the functions and effects of each gene, the possibility of technological manipulation, what kind of freedom, history, and human being will eventually survive. Recent developments in molecular biology and genetic engineering are going to change our human being concept and a whole series of other philosophical and common notions, such as knowledge, subject, self, history, past, science, ethics, etc. The traditional idea of subject wont be any more the only final reference of philosophical thinking, si... ...philosophy ? a high speed mutant of ancient type philosophy ? should prevail with a main task to inquire and understand the consequences of these new technologies and to represent it in scie ntific, brotherly and ethical debates. Similar to when Kant urged philosophers in the eighteenth century to trance towards humans, now there is a need to turn towards genes. In sustained dialogs and partnerships with life scientists and politicians, philosophers ease up to develop new merits of freedom, person and evolution and to investigate the possible ways of improving human life on earth. We have to remember on the pragmatic adage, if philosophy and science lack social fruits in the long run, then it does not deserve the attention of the society. On the other hand, if the science and society do not open up for philosophical deliberations, it can have monstrous consequences.