Need for Immigration Reform

Immigration refers to the straw man of plenty from one country to settle in a nonher. In the join States of America, foreigners get since meter immemorial been moving in and settling in the U.S. Immigration brings about culture change as different mountain have varying cultures. There has been sharp disintegration between those who atomic number 18 naturally in the U.S and those who came to settle there. In about cases they were excluded from the U.S citizenship.The Mc Carran-Walter portrayal, which is excessively known as the Immigration and Nationality operation of 1952, establishes the basic virtues of citizenship and in-migration in the U.S. over the years this law has chthoniangone several changes. The law initially admitted a certain number of in-migration of each studyity. This means that on attaining the undertake number of immigrants other people were excluded from U.S. (Bromwell 225)In 1965, the congress passed a law that paved way to immigrants with certai n skills needed by the U.S. It as well as allowed close down relatives of U.S citizens the preference to live in U.S. In 1990, a law was passed that reenforce the 1965 one.Aliens were allowed to attain U.S citizenship but later being admitted as efficacious immigrants. Again, those who fled to the U.S after being officially certified as refugees could receive immigrant status. The statutory remains in the U.S was racial discriminatory. The sequence of laws from 1882 by means of 1934 excluded immigrants from China, Japan, India and the Philippines. It was therefore biased.( http//www.umass.edu/complit/aclanet/usMigrat.html)The Chinese excision of puzzle out of 1882 prohibited citizenship for Chinese immigrants in 1884, 1886 and 1888 other pieces were passed to reinforce this act. It was the just act that was so explicit on race-establish in-migration. The Immigration Act of 1917 ejection of Asiatic Indians Act. This Act was passed basing on the fact that their racial a nd ethnic status was non well elaborated.In 1922, Japan born appli pratts who had lived in the U.S for most of their lives could non get U.S citizenship. This was done with the argument that their language differed very more from the U.S and this would create problems. However, so as not to create problems based on color, the court defined white as Caucasian.In 1923, as immigrants from India and Bhagat Singh Thind attempted to claim that they were Caucasian. The court changed the definition. It sidelined anthropo system of logical and historical write outs to silver a word that would not actor much attention. It also disjunct the desir equal immigrants form the undesirable ones. (Josiah 57)The Immigration Act of 1924 excluded Japanese from U.S citizenship. This act totally excluded Japanese and other Asiatic who had been barred by the 1790 naturalisation law that stated that only whites could be naturalized as citizens. It was aimed at reducing or balancing ethnic distribut ion as immigrants from europium and Asia were increasing drastically. (Miller et al, 304)The Tydings-McDuffie Act of 1932 excluded Filipinos easy access to its citizenship it cut down the number of persons to be taken in to of 50 persons per year. Filipinos living in the U.S were named or titled aliens. The U.S reaction against the Filipinos was connected with issue of Philippine independence from U.S colonization. This was like a hit back question towards the Filipinos. (http//www.umass.edu/complit/aclanet/usMigrat.html)In 1913, 1920, 1923 alien land laws prohibited the Asians, immigrants from owning any form of retention including land. The U.S considered those who were not whites in worthy to acquire citizenship and consequently could not own property.The Asian Barred Zone Act of 1917, denied people from randomness Asia to South eastside Asia and the islands. In the Indian and Pacific oceans surprisingly, it excluded Ameri abide possessions of the Philippines and Guam.The Magnuson Act of 1943 brought a substantial change to the plight of immigrants of Asian origin. It repealed the 1882 exclusion act that prohibited immigrants of Asian origin from gaining U.S citizenship. It established a quota for Chinese immigrants and made Chinese eligible for citizenship. (Bromwell 225)The Mc Carran Act of 1952 abolished the 1917 Asia Barred Zone Act and allowed Asian immigration into the United States based on ethnic quotas. The quotas were not specified on bailiwickity but through racialized ethnic categories. 100 ethnic persons were allowed to enter U.S annually. These were from versatile nations. The Cold War effects made the U.S to have strict quotas that were based on strategic territorial mapping. Any alien who engaged in questionable activities would be deported on the claims of public kindle or national warranter threat issues. (Miller et al, 57)The 1965 immigration act removed natural origins as the basis of the U.S immigration legislation. This is s ay that considering citizens only by birth was eliminated. It was an amendment of the 1952 Mc Carren Act. It gave preferences to people of the Eastern Hemisphere and allowed their adult single sons and daughters to be citizens. Spouses and unmarried sons and daughters of eternal residents could also gain U.S citizenship. Professionals, scientists and artists who had extreme capabilities were allowed in too.Other categories of people who got U.S citizenship were married adults sons and daughters of U.S citizenship, brothers and sisters of adult citizens, scarperers both skilled and unskilled who would fill the inadequacying(p) labor supply in the U.S as well as refugees who came from communist based countries. Those affected by natural calamities were also allowed.After 1965, legal regulations on immigration shifted their focus or refocuse on how definition was move. For showcase alien was replaced with smuggled. The Asia immigrant history is reflected in the Asian American culture and they do remember how the U.S segregated them.The Indochina migration and refugee Assistance Act of 1975, the Refugee Act of 1980, and the Amerasian homecoming Act of 1987 facilitated the immigration and settlement of Southeast Asian refugees. The Asian immigration comprised immigrants from South Korea, Philippines, South Vietnam and Cambodia and was due to U.S colonialism, war and neocolonialism. Most Asians immigrated due to disruption by colonialism or distortions form neocolonial practices like capitalism or due to war.In 1986 the Immigrant Reform and Control Act was present in place. It was to reform the authentic mail service on immigration. The Immigration Act of 1990 reinforced it. Illegal citizens got citizenship those who were there before 1982. It was a crime to hire illegal immigrants. Immigration directly is still a sensitive mater than creates, contradictions between the capital and the state, sparing and political imperatives. Californians Proposition 187 was passed in 1994 and it denies education and medical c atomic number 18 to illegal immigrants. It is observed that groups aimed here be Mexicans and Latinos.Latinos and Mexicans have provided semi-skilled labor to the U.S since the 1950s. They operate on in farms, hotels and domestic services in U.S and they get low wages for that. They work under poor conditions. The U.S does not improve their working conditions and those positions do not attract its own citizens. This perpetuates the movement of illegal immigration in inquisition for low wage jobs. (George 52)The 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 made significant changes on asylum law, immigration detention, and criminal-related immigration.The Real ID Act of 2005 was aimed at barring terrorism. National standards were established, waiving laws that interfered with construction of physical barriers at the puts. It entailed shake up laws on application for asylum and alien deportati on for terrorism activity. The governance funded reports with security and changing visa limits for maverick workers.After the 9/11 U.S had to reform the immigration laws. Entry of civil immigration was to be put into the national crime information center, a computer crime database to do by it. Deportation was to take place. People supporting immigrants would be jailed. Employees ordain be required to verify their employees eligibility to work through the manipulation eligibility check systems. Illegal workers were to be granted guest workers visas. H-1 B visas would be intentional for comprises to employ temporary skilled workers.There is need to reform the current, immigration rules and regulations in U.S. the rule of verifying ones immigration status even in churches is an extreme. It reduces the work of the church leaders to immigration enforcement officials. Being penalized for helping immigrants who in most cases are poor is jeopardizing with Christians faith of a call to help. It will create conflict between the church and the state. ( calling card Ong Hing 79)Today, the system will bewray to attract and retain legal permanent immigrants who are most able to contribute valuable clement resources to the country. Reforms ought to be done to legal permanent and temporary systems to promote recruitment and retainment of migrants who can contribute to the U.S national interest in immigration. Reforming of changing the institutional and regulatory structure governing the employment of immigrants within the U.S to ensure migrants contribute maximally to development of U.S and at reduce costs. Immigration control policies should be changed and immigration should not be used as a tool of foreign policy.( http//ccis-ucsd.org/publication/wrkg132.pdf)The government should tractor trailer long-term issues regarding to the immigrants role in the economy instead of tackling new temporary worker program. The immigration bill will cost the country a lot of mo ney and this would be jeopardized if ID theft were carried out. Creation of Employment Eligibility checkout (EEV) systems that will entail racy levels of sharing of information across numerous electronic databases can be easily tampered. EEVS will part peoples personal information like social security records, passport and visa records and even birth and death records, all of which can be used for identity.The 2005 House of Representatives bill 4437 (H.R 4437) about creating a vie along Mexico and criminalizing the aiding of illegal immigrants and mandatory detention of illegal aliens is an in called for measure. It is against the planetary human rights as the immigrants are people who have rights. Detaining well-nighone without present of crime committed is an unfair act. Although the H-1 B visas will allow immigrants to work in U.S companies temporarily is not good enough. There will be extreme competition for the visas provided. The industries that benefit a lot from fore ign expertise will not optimize their production, as they would want the number of visas increased.( Bill Ong Hing 79)More rational and long-term solutions should be sought to replace the acerb penalties that have been put in place. The process of legally attempting to enter the U.S and the hands is not only complex but also expensive and time consuming even for those who would could add value to the countrys human resource.Immigration to Australia is different from the U.S. the country has a strong economy and attracts extremely skilled young people who are willing. It uses fair criteria in engrossing immigrants into its workforce. It applies ones qualifications, work experience as well as language proficiency. It has established immigration programs like the Humanitarian Program and Australian Family Migration.It emphasizes on attracting people who can contribute positively to the economy. It assists immigrants in settling by helping them reside in areas of their choice. Cana da is one of the worlds top immigration destination and more than 200,000 new arrivals come under the Canada immigration system annually. It is easier to settle in Canada and obtaining a visa is not very difficult. Like Australia, Canada upholds people with skills and experience and those who are to venture into business. A large proportion of immigration to Canada is under family re union and refugee programs. It also allows for people who are on holidays.Germany on the other hand attempts to pass on the highly skilled workers low skilled workers will therefore dislodge its accessibility difficult. Professors, natural scientists, engineers and scientific qualified personnel in high technologies find immigration easy. They are also given permanent manse and their family members allowed working in Germany as well. Self employed immigrants or entrepreneurs are also allowed as long as they create jobs for Germans and makes profits. Through the Schengen musical arrangement people c an travel through the Schengen countries with one schengen visa.Policy makers should sympathize the global market for immigrants as an opportunity. The visa laws should take advantage of the situation by ensuring that the recruitment process is beneficial to the country through enable retainment of needed immigrants. Economic migration will be beneficial to the countrys economy.The legal visa system fails to meet its goals. It is outdated and waiting lists for some family visas take more than 20 years. This hinders family members who applied at the prime of their lives to be eventually denied the chance until they are at their retirement age and can add very little if any economic contribution.(http//ccis-ucsd.org/publication/wrkg132.pdf)The logic of family reunion is at times not realized and this is a cause of illegal migration due to frustrations experienced. Setting numerical limits of how many are to be accepted in the system will not be a successful measure unless there is an establishment of flexible numerical limits with mechanisms put in place for adjusting the limits up or down.The criteria used to come up with the limits as to which one should not exceed is also questionable. There could lack consensus on how much the number should be causing loopholes in the system. Immigrants have been beneficial to the U.S economy and they contribute to majority of the new jobs. The issue of immigration is a politicized issue and the point is lost when politics outshine facts and economics. Immigrants should not be harshly treated.Family based visa rules should be restructured to attain the doctor purpose of family reunion visas. However this should not outshine the economic proceed role. Temporary visas are not the best to attract the most heavy(p) immigrants. Very harsh measures on immigrants who are basically looking for smash lives in lesser paying jobs are uncalled for. The many unregistered immigrants do not actually cause a threat to the U.S security . They suffer a lot due to the limited access to social and political services. Criminalizing undocumented immigrants will be a problem as it will encourage more activities in the black market and it wont be economically viable for the U.S.Tightening security at the borders is a shiny idea but the rate at which deaths are registered is alarming. If policies were more cooperative this should not be occurring. Increasing the staff and the technology to speed up legal entries will be an appropriate measure in ensuring that immigrants are cleared up faster.According to the conservatives deportation act will not be economically viable to the country. They support the immigrants in fighting for their rights through numerous strikes and demonstrations. The libels support the government in enforcing its sanctions. They are willing and educate to support the government in fighting its enemies be it foreign or domestic. Conservatives advocate for creation of new legal channels for immigran ts. However, protection of national security should not be neglected. To prevent future illegal border crossing the congress should grant immigrants already in U.S form of legal status.Works citedJana Evans-Braziel.History of migration and immigration laws in the United States.General premises of US Citizens.Retreived on 29th October 2007 fromhttp//www.umass.edu/complit/aclanet/usMigrat.htmlMarc R.Rosenblum.US Immigration Reform can the system Be repaired. Retrieved on29th October 2006 fromhttp//ccis-ucsd.org/publication/wrkg132.pdfBromwell W. Jeremy. History of Immigrants to the United States, A M Kelley, 1969.pp225Miller E Willard and Ruby M United States Immigration. A university extension handbook 1996JV6465 M55.pp304.Josiah M Herman Finding a Moral heart for US Migration policy. An anthropologicalPerspective.pp57Roy H.Beck The Case Against migration NewYork, 1996,pp40George J.Borjas Heavens doors. Princeton University Press.1999, pp52.Bill O. Hing The immigrant as criminal pe nalize dreamers.9 Hasting womens law1998 Journal 79